https://banned.video/watch?id=64b1c311c31445217d004682

Who stands to gain from the UN and the WHO declaring aspartame carcinogenic?

Government, that’s who.

For many years, the federal government along with non-profit “food safety” groups (more like food industry apologists) defended aspartame against “conspiracy theorists,” even going so far as to claim such conspiracy theories were funded by the “sugar lobby.”

One such organization which defended aspartame – as well as sucralose, another sugar substitute linked to cancer – is the Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI). You know, CSPI, the group which said in 1988 that trans fats were harmless despite evidence to the contrary, only to turn around a few years later and claim “we never said trans fats were harmless?”

In 2006, the government put out a report which said that aspartame was good for you. The article cited the Center for Science in the Public Interest as praising the results. As written by Paul Joseph Watson, “”The AP cites the Center For Science in the Public Interest as praising the results of the study. CFSPI is a Rockefeller front organization that also receives funding from Ted Turner’s Nuclear Threat Initiative.”

So why now – after years of defending aspartame against “conspiracy theorists” – are the UN and WHO now saying aspartame is carcinogenic?

If you think it’s to validate the “conspiracy theorists,” you have another thing coming.

The truth is, the UN and the WHO needed the perfect crisis in order to get the global population so hopping mad that they will relinquish their liberties for temporary security against those evil toxic food peddlers who are working hand-in-hand with the globalists.

So what is the ultimate agenda?

It’s all about taking people’s freedom of food choices in the name of “security” and the Great Reset. If they can take away your aspartame (and it’s proven to be addictive), then they will have the justification to take away your morning cup of coffee, your daily breakfast and scrambled eggs with buttered toast and an ice cold glass of milk, and a hearty dinner of fresh garden vegetables served with a free-range chicken from your own backyard.

And if they can take away your coffee, meat, milk, and eggs, they can take away other things which they do not approve of.

In 1994, a federal law was passed which allowed the manufacture and sale of alternative medicines made from natural herbs as long as the manufacturer made no claims that said alternative medicines can cure you of any disease or disorder. Yes, you can sell a 200-count bottle of 1000 mg Vitamin C tablets as long as you don’t claim that your product can or will treat or cure the common cold.

This law – called the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994 (or DSHEA for short) – has also been used to allow a South American herb to be sold as a dietary supplement. However, this “dietary supplement” has been used for years as a sweetener. In the United States, it is illegal to advertise pure stevia leaves – or pure stevia extract – as a sweetener. Advertising it as a dietary supplement? That’s just fine, according to the FDA. However, calling is a sweetener would threaten their controlling interests in aspartame, saccharin, and sucralose, and they cannot and will not allow that!

So imagine if the globalists use the aspartame controvery as a pretext to ban other “unhealthy” stuff such as sugary sodas, meat, milk, eggs, and salt. They could declare that stevia is a silent killer and call for DSHEA to be repealed.

Who would suffer the most from the repealment of DSHEA? We the people, as we would be forced to rely on Big Pharma drugs and only Big Pharma drugs, as all alternatives would be illegal. Alternative health salespeople such as Alex Jones, Mike Adams, Joseph Mercola, and the like would suffer as well, as they could lose millions – if not billions – of dollars because they have products they can no longer sell and are forced to destroy at gunpoint. (Yes, the FDA does employ armed officers.) In addition, Jones, Adams, and Mercola could be prosecuted the possession of illegal dietary supplements.