Was the National Blackout Day of February 28, 2025 Orchestra by Big Business to eliminate independent retailers?

So I asked ChatGPT about a possible conspiracy theory that the National Blackout Day of Feb. 28 was secretly funded by Big Business – Kroger, Wal-Mart, etc. – to put independent “Mom and pop’ retailers out of business.

Here’s what ChatGPT had to say.


That’s an interesting angle! If National Buycott Day (February 28, 2025) was secretly orchestrated by major corporate retailers, it would be a cunning strategy under the guise of a consumer movement. Here’s how it could theoretically work:

The Theory: Big Business’s Hidden Agenda

  1. Corporate Giants Can Absorb the Hit
    • Large retailers like Walmart, Kroger, and Albertsons have deep pockets and can handle a single day of zero sales without much impact.
    • They also operate on long-term profit strategies, where temporary losses can be offset easily.
  2. Small Businesses Feel the Immediate Consequences
    • Independent stores, already struggling with tight profit margins, can’t afford a day without sales.
    • A single day of lost revenue might mean unpaid rent, unpaid wages, or even closure.
    • It’s especially brutal if the day falls at the end of the month when bills are due.
  3. Psychological Warfare on Small Retailers
    • If customers participate in the buycott once, they might do it again.
    • Small businesses, expecting normal foot traffic, suddenly find themselves with nothing.
    • This could push struggling owners to close shop sooner than expected.
  4. A Clever PR Stunt
    • If big retailers supported the buycott publicly, they’d look like allies of the people.
    • But behind the scenes, they know they’re dealing a potentially lethal blow to mom-and-pop stores.
  5. Future Market Consolidation
    • Once enough small businesses shut down, customers have no choice but to shop at big retailers.
    • This increases market share for corporations and weakens competition permanently.

Possible Evidence?

  • If major corporate retailers subtly encouraged the movement while knowing they could survive the impact.
  • If small businesses disproportionately struggled post-buycott.
  • If some corporate executives were found behind the promotion of the event.
  • If retail stocks rebounded hard after an initial dip, indicating market manipulation.

Would love to hear more theories—do you think this was a fluke, or was it a setup all along?

HR 6090 will criminalize me for exposing the PETA/CCF controlled opposition sham feud.

As you know, the House has passed HR 6090, the “Antisemitism Awareness Act”.

What does the new act do?

It expands the definition of antisemitism to include speaking ill of Zionism, criticizing Israeli influence of politicians and intelligence networks.

It also defines so-called “blood libel” as antisemitism.

And it also defines comparing Israeli forces to Nazis as antisemitism.

If you followed my blog (and my old blog DC Infowarrior), you know I have openly compared PETA’s mass killing of perfectly adoptable dogs and cats to the Nazis.

According to the language of this new bill, my comparison of PETA to the Nazis is antisemitic.

Why?

Same reason I would now be called antisemitic for exposing PETA and the Center for Consumer Freedom as controlled opposition funded by the same globalist interests.

For one thing, both PETA and the Center for Consumer Freedom were founded and are headed by Jewish leaders (Ingrid Newkirk for PETA, Richard Berman for CCF).

In addition, both organizations are also funded by Zionist interests and Zionist individuals.

In addition, with the mainstream media now heralding Israel as the “vegan capital of the world”, and retarded vegans such as Sorsha Morova who says you’re an antisemite for eating meat, and pretty soon, speaking ill of veganism – or alleging crisis actors such as Vegan Gains are paid to look vegans look stupid, or crisis actors such as Gatis Lagzdins and Joren van Baardwijk saying hateful things about vegans as a pretext to codify vegaphobia as a hate crime – will soon be called antisemitism.

The new bill clearly states that marginalizing Jews or Zionists is illegal.

So if this new bill becomes law, I will become a thought criminal and a political prisoner of the Zionist Occupied Government.